My comments will get lengthy, so let's just get into it.
#1 - Houston Texans : Jadeveon Clowney [DE/OLB, South Carolina]
I understand and respect the case for (QB) Blake Bortles here, but passing on a once-a-generation talent will haunt the franchise for years... more so than any of the flawed QBs who might develop into something decent. New HC Bill O'Brien can get his QB at the top of the 2nd Round or trade back into the 1st for a slipping QB prospect. Also, the Texans had a 32 sacks last year, 3rd worst in the NFL. Clowney will have an immediate impact, improving this critical statistical category.
#2 - *** TRADE *** Minnesota Vikings (from St. Louis) : Blake Bortles [QB, UCF]
Take the NFL's most aggressive GM and pair him with the NFL's trade-down king (whose name is not Bill Belichick) and this is what you get. This move is prompted by the lack of faith that Bortles or Carr will fall to them at #8, with QB needy teams like JAC, CLE, OAK, and possibly TB in between. GM Les Sneed doesn't need to, but maximizes value and return by trading down a few spots. Increasing the chances that he addresses 3 out of the 4 biggest needs he has (CB, WR, OT, S) with some marquee players.
Minnesota trades:
> 1st Round (#8)
> 2nd Round (#40)
> 6th Round (#184)
> 2015 2nd Round Pick
St. Louis trades:
> 1st Round (#2)
> 7th Round (#241)
#3 - Jacksonville Jaguars : Justin Gilbert [CB, Oklahoma State]
I believe that Clowney and Bortles were 1st and 2nd choice. Realistically and schematically, I think that all QBs are still in play. But I have a gut feeling that they will leverage the 11 draft choices they have to get back into the 1st round for a QB. So in looking at the fact that the Jags gave up the 5th most points, 7th most passing yards, and their starting CBs names are Alan Ball and Dwayne Gratz... I see (HC) Gus Bradley looking to replicate his Seattle defense with the addition of a size/length/speed option like Gilbert. So no, I'm not buying into the negative rumors around Gilbert.
#4 - Cleveland Browns : Derek Carr [QB, Fresno State]
With the extended review period this year, there is little chance Carr is there at #26. The rumors of the Derek Carr infatuation are not unfounded. It's my belief that former heads of state (Joe Banner and Mike Lombardi) were disgruntled and had leaked information to the media. Nonetheless, Carr offers the arm talent to cut through the cold lakeshore winds, the leadership to be a steady entity on a historically losing squad, and the moxie required for a blue collar city. Surrounded by young offensive weapons and a good o-line, there are few organizations where a rookie QB can step in so easily.
#5 - *** TRADE *** St. Louis Rams (from Oakland) : Sammy Watkins [WR, Clemson]
In this scenario, the Rams are the richest bitches on the block. Why not trade up and grab the guy that they wanted at #2? The cost to do so will be cheap (due to draft pick wealth), but would be costly for other teams in lesser situations. In Sammy Watkins, they would have a #1 WR to rid themselves of Sam Bradford excuses. Otherwise, they can trot out Kenny Britt and Brian Quick on the perimeter and Tavon Austin in the slot. #DidNotThinkSo. Argument could be made to take Mike Evans, if Tampa takes Watkins at 7, but Evans is in the same build/mold as Britt and Quick. Watkins is unique and adds an element to the offense that they lack.
St. Louis trades:
> 1st Round (#8) - pick from MIN
> 3rd Round (#75)
> 4th Round (#153)
> 6th Round (#184) - pick from MIN
Oakland trades:
> 1st Round (#5)
#6 - Atlanta Falcons : Jake Matthews [LT, Texas A&M]
Needless to say Atlanta is sitting pretty with options here. OLB Kahlil Mack, OT Greg Robinson, or OT Jake Matthews. Personally, I give the edge to Matthews, as the Falcons have a pass-centric offense, and he is a more natural pass protector than Robinson. Why left tackle? Well when you pay your QB $103M, made a blockbuster trade to grab Julio Jones, talked a hall of famer TE out of retirement, naturally you want to protect your QB's blind side with someone better than Sam Baker. In round 2 the Falcons can address the pass rush, and grab one of the fast rising rush OLBs that are buzzing right now
#7 - Tampa Bay Buccaneers : Greg Robinson [LT, Auburn]
To most folks this will come as a surprise. Personally, I haven't seen a mock draft that dares to let a guy they compare to Orlando Pace to slide this far. So no doubt this would be a steal. In a conference where the Bucs face Rob Ryan's aggressive pass rush, Atlanta's change-over to an attacking 3-4, and the Panthers insanely stout defense... they better find a way to protect the QB. More importantly, with new OC Jeff Tedford's ball-control offense, running the ball behind this behemoth is an immediate upgrade. Everyone's mocks has the Bucs picking a WR, but they can do so later... especially in this draft.
#8 - Oakland Raiders (from Minnesota through St. Louis) : Mike Evans [WR, Texas A&M]
Holy crap this roster is terrible! No doubt the Raiders should go with the "Best Player Available", and sadly that pick will arguably be the best player on the entire team. If the picks fall wimilar to what I have here, it could come down to Aaron Donald and Mike Evans. Looking at OC Greg Olsen's tendencies and the liklihood of the Raiders playing from behind, 3 WR sets will be the norm. In Evans, is a difference-maker that can be both a field-stretcher and a redzone target. His impressive catch radius and high-point ability will be put to good use, as Matt Schaub's inaccuracy will not be helped by a porous line. All the Raiders can hope to do is suck less.
#9 - Buffalo Bills : Morgan Moses [OT, Virginia]
When Buffalo traded a 6th round pick for the former Bucs WR Mike Williams, they addressed the position. Regardless of Williams laziness, which probably won't change, the Bills will likely go in another direction in the first stanza. HC Doug Marrone wants to run run run, which makes Morgan Moses an intriguing option. Opposite Cordy Glenn, the Bills o-line will be bookended by dual OTs that are both 6'6"/+340. With those two giants on each side, CJ Spiller, Fred Jackson, and your grandma could find running lanes open up.
#10 - *** TRADE *** Philadelphia Eagles (from Detroit) : Kahlil Mack [OLB, Buffalo]
This trade is more manufactured creativity than anything. When I look at Detroit, I disagree with most that HaHa Clinton-Dix is in play at this pick. New DC Teryl Austin is a big believer in clear FS/SS designations, and seems very happy with newly aquired Glover Quin roaming the deep middle like Ed Reed did for him in Baltimore. CB and DE are areas that make the most sense for me. Instead of picking CB Kyle Fuller here, I think they trade down to an uber aggressive Philadelphia franchise.
On the Philadelphia side of the phone, will be a salivating Chip Kelly, if Mack ships past Atlanta at 6. I imagine they will seek trading partners before Tennessee, as Mack would be a no-brainer for the Titans. Already this offseason, the Eagles have been rumored to trade for former Oregon Duck OLB Dion Jordan from Miami. Trent Cole, Brandon Graham, and Vinny Curry are all pure 43 DEs and struggled mightily to make the transition to 34 OLB.
Phildelphia trades:
> 1st Round (#22)
> 3th Round (#86)
> 2015 2nd Round Pick
> DE Brandon Graham or Vinny Curry
Detroit trades:
> 1st Round (#10)
> 6th Round (#189)
> 7th Round (#227)
#11 - Tennessee Titans : Ra'Shede Hageman [5T, Minnesota]
Tennessee is a difficult team to figure out. The overall roster is actually pretty decent. New HC Ken Whisenhunt has run some pretty diverse offenses in his time. New DC Ray Horton is installing a new attacking 3-4 defense. But because there are pieces in place to make all of the transitions less bumpy, so it's hard to pinpoint immediate need. I slated the Golden Gopher here, due to only having one true 5-technique DE on the roster. Desmond Bryant (in CLE) and Calais Campbell (in ARI) were Ray Horton's attacking 5Ts. In this year's draft, Hageman is the only elite option that can fit this role.
#12 - New York Giants : Aaron Donald [DT, Pittsburgh]
Remember when the Giants had a feared defensive line? Yeah, that isn't the case anymore. After losing Linval Joseph in Free Agency, things will not get better. Of all the needs, an there are many, I think the defensive line needs to be addressed first. In typical years, the Giants would be addressing this by selecting a pass rushing DE. This year, I think their best option is to generate a push from the interior. In turn, this will help Jason Pierre-Paul and Mathias Kiwanuka get more one-on-one situations on the outside. Aaron Donald will do just that, and potentially reach Geno Adkins level of play.
#13 - St. Louis Rams : Hasean "HaHa" Clinton-Dix [FS, Alabama]
The NFL's shift towards pass friendly rules has brought forth pass-centric offenses. As a byproduct, there is premium on safeties that can read offenses, tackle in the open field, and cover (both man and zone). Hasean is the most proven of this year's crop, and the Rams are desperate for a FS upgrade, so the match is logical. If a team wants Hasean more, they will have to jump the Rams at 13, but I have my doubts. It's not to his detriment, but safeties that lack of elite speed and athleticism are tough to give up draft picks to acquire.
#14 - *** TRADE *** Cleveland Browns (from Chicago) : Odell Beckham [WR, LSU]
This would be a bold gesture by the new GM Ray Farmer, and would only make sense if a QB is had at #4. In a year that has the deepest crop of WRs ever, draft analysts everywhere will have a heyday ripping on the Browns. Why this trade makes sense, has to do with with offensive diversity. Teams that can attack every level with multiple players and formations are scary to defend. In Beckham, I see the ability to do what others in the draft can't do. There are guys that can take the top off the defense with fades, corners and 9 routes. Or guys that can take a slip screen the distance... but not usually both. Pair that up with Josh Gordon, Jordan Cameron, and Andrew Hawkins... good God.
Why this makes sense for the Bears is simple, they missed out on Donald and Clinton-Dix who are easily the biggest targets. It also doesn't hurt that trading down 12 spots will net them 2-3rd round picks. The extra picks will help them sew up the 30th ranked run defense, in a conference where AP and Lacy are coming down the middle.
Cleveland trades:
> 1st Round (#26)
> 3rd Round (#71)
> 3rd Round (#83)
> 7th Round (#218)
Chicago trades:
> 1st Round (#14)
> 7th Round (#191)
#15 - Pittsburgh Steelers : Kyle Fuller [CB, Virginia Tech]
Pittsburgh is getting older and older, and they only have themselves to blame for it. GM Kevin Colbert and ownership is way too loyal to their aging players. The franchise seems too frightened to make a tough decision, which has led to an annual poor cap situation. This last year, when they should have cut the aged and deteriorated CB Ike Taylor, they renegotiated. This year, CB Cortez Allen is in a contract year, and could be gone. Long story short, the Steelers need a CB early and high. In Fuller, you have an atheletic guy with size and technical cover skills. He won't take chances, but that will come with time.
#16 - *** TRADE *** San Francisco 49ers (from Dallas) : Austin Seferian-Jenkins [TE, Washington State]
ASJ over Eric Ebron? WHAT! Well word on the street is that the Niners want to run more 12 formation sets, for this to happen they will need a "Y" (in-line) TE. In most years, not this year, there is a lack of quality Y-TEs. But the reason why I think they should trade up for ASJ, is to give Kaepernick a passing weapon, which Y-TEs are not always known for. With ASJ, you have an amazing wing-span, agility, high-point ability, and in-line blocking. If they don't trade up, I think other teams like BAL, NYJ, MIA, GB, KC, CAR will target ASJ, as everyone wants to mimic the 2-TE Patriot offense. It's much harder to find a Gronk-like Y-TE than it is to find a F-TE like Aaron Hernandez was.
San Francisco trades:
> 1st Round (#30)
> 2nd Round (#56)
> 3rd Round (#77)
> 7th Round (#242)
Dallas trades:
> 1st Round (#16)
> 5th Round (#158)
#17 - Baltimore Ravens : Zach Martin [OT/OG, Notre Dame]
If GM Ozzie Newsome was a baseball player, he would bat 2nd in the lineup and lead the league in batting average and hitting doubles. What I'm saying is, the best GM in the NFL doesn't try to hit home runs with boom-or-bust prospects. He's perfectly happy filling his meal ticket with solid, safe, unspectacular, best player available logic. Insert Zach Martin, a solid technician who can probably play every position on the line. This also will help a team that had the most sacks and ranked 30th in rushing a year ago. No matter where he plays, OC Gary Kubiak zone-blocking scheme has one building block.
#18 - New York Jets : Brandin Cooks [WR, Oregon State]
No doubt, this is the last make-or-break year for Rex Ryan (me thinks). GM John Idzik has done a good job being aggressive in Free Agency, which will allow Ryan every chance to succeed. So when it comes to the draft, I expect them to try to trade up and find guys that can contribute immediately. For so many years, Ryan and Jets have watched Wes Welker light them up from the slot. In Cooks the undersized WR can cause mismatches and get open on his own, the same as Welker. Someone like this will be critical for the Jets, as they need someone to take the focus off of WR Eric Decker.
#19 - Miami Dolphins : Marquise Lee [WR, USC]
If the Dolphins were to draft off of need, it would be OT Taylor Lewan or OG Xavier Su'a-Filo here. But I think that ownership will want a pick to both excite the fan base and provide a weapon for their young QB. On their board, would potentially be WR Marquise Lee or TE Eric Ebron. Personally I think that pairing Charles Clay at H-Back with Ebron at the "F" (Move) TE will cause major protection issues for a team that already struggles to keep their QB upright. Lee makes the most sense, and he'll offer some silky route running that Tannehill will love. Also, 2 Miami WRs are coming off major injuries.
#20 - Arizona Cardinals : Jeremiah Attaochu [OLB, Georgia Tech]
Arizona's pass rush is already very good, and frankly the team identity, but OLB John Abraham is 35 and needs to be replaced soon. Of late, Attaochu has been rising and everything seems legit. So much so, that in five years' time we might look back and be shocked how low Attaochu will be drafted. His ability is on the raw side, but not has a remarkable toolset to work with. His length, strength, and athleticism are evident... and I hear good things about his first step and bend. Time will tell, but he is well worth the risk.
#21 - Green Bay Packers : Eric Ebron [TE, North Carolina]
Ebron this far down might surprise some, but if the NYJ, NYG, and TEN go another direction this could happen. An unlikely but intriguing possibility would also be for the Patriots to trade up for Ebron's services. But in Green Bay Ebron will be the perfect fill-in as a field stretching F-TE to replace JerMichael Finley. This also makes sense, as in GB he won't be asked to block much, so he won't be the liability that he normally would be in a more traditional offense. What's funny is he is just as susceptible to drops as Finley was, which will give Discount Double Check headaches.
#22 - Detroit Lions (from Philadelphia) : Phillip Gaines [CB, Rice]
As said before, Detroit wants to install an aggressive and intimidating defense. For this to happen, the annually poor cornerback situation needs to be addressed. Teams cannot allow linement to pin their ears back and rush the passer without steady CB play. Gaines is an under-the-radar cover corner that I am higher on, than most. His ability to mirror WRs of any size and ability was put on display when he shut down Mike Evans last year. That said, I'll admit that I could be wrong about him. But one thing is for sure, with the litany of teams that have CB need... and the prevmium that is placed on the position... the Lions have to come away from round 1 with a CB.
#23 - *** TRADE *** Jacksonville Jaguars (from Kansas City) : Teddy Bridgewater [QB, Louisville]
In my scenario, both the Texans and the Jags walk away from their Top 3 spots without a QB. Every year, top of the 2nd round targets get pushed into the bottom or the 1st. It happens every year, where those teams trade up to get their guy... regardless if you are sitting at the 1st pick in the 2nd round or not (it doesn't matter). To me Kansas City seems like the most likely dance partner (here). And because the Jags have more depth and value of picks, they should outbid Houston for this pick.
In a (OC) Jedd Fisch offense, I think Bridgewater could do quite well. Fisch likes to run an up-tempo offense that seeks to stretch defenses both vertically and horizontally, while sending a lot of guys in motion. All of these elements are not that dissimilar from what Teddy ran at Louisville. Manziel could also be in play, but I don't think he can live within such a limiting scheme.
Jacksonville trades:
> 2nd Round (#39)
> 3rd Round (#70)
> 5th Round (#144)
Kansas City trades:
> 1st Round (#23)
> 7th Round (#200)
#24 - Cincinnati Bengals : Bradley Roby [CB, Ohio State]
In previous years, the Bengals have had the luxury of (former DC) Mike Zimmer's expertise to get more production out of retreads and lesser talents. Now that Zimmer is gone, it will be interesting to see how the back 7 of the defense responds. My guess is that the concerns over the limitations of the defensive backfield will lead to early picks to fill the talent gap. Drafting Roby will please the fan base, as they are all aware of the home state Buckeye's unparralleled atheticism and ability. This also follows every Bengal draft strategy (and cheap scouting), ove rthe last 10 years, by picking big school prospects ONLY.
#25 - San Diego Chargers : Taylor Lewan [LT, Michigan]
If Lewan slides this far (or farther), I think it will a typical microcosm of the draft process. What I mean is that scouts usually firm up evaluations well before the media and coaching staffs. So when the Combine rolls around, freakish performances at the "Underwear Olympics" become the first impression for most. In most cases, I'm no different. But the hype is too high. That said, he still can be a steady LT in the NFL. This move would allow DJ Fluker to move from LT to RT, and King Dunlap to a more appropriate swing tackle role. This still doesn't address the most glaring need at CB, but this is the right value pick here.
#26 - Chicago Bears (from Cleveland) : C.J. Mosley [MLB, Alabama]
I like Mosley at 26, not at 14 where the Bears were at. There are just too many difference makers in the draft, and no matter how you slice it MLBs (not named Luke Kuechly or Ray Lewis) are no better than fringe first round picks. Tack on the fact that Mosley lacks elite atheticism and has a notable injury history, the risk is lessened at 26. If he can stay healthy, Mosley will help fix the league's worst run defense. The experiment to have John Bostic or D.J. Williams at Mike Backer can be put to rest. And both can compete for playing time at weakside OLB, where they are better suited.
#27 - New Orleans Saints : Jordan Matthews [WR, Vanderbilt]
If the Saints were to draft biggest need, it would be OT. As Nevada's Joel Bitonio is more OG than OT, I dont' think they go that direction. So now that Sean Peyton is without Lance Moore, GM Mickey Loomis needs to find a steady target for Drew Brees. Matthews was extremely refined for a collegiate receiver, and has the ability to play the slot or on the perimeter which is key for Peyton's offense. Any concerns over his speed or separation skills are absurd. The only adjustment Matthews will experience will be moving away from scatter-shot QBs to Drew Brees. Hopefully, he can adjust to accurate throws.
# 28 - Carolina Panthers : Joel Bitonio [OT/OG, Nevada]
In a two minute analysis of the roster, I see a ton of holes. For example, the Panthers' fierce D was owed to having four superstar impact players, the rest road their coattails. On offense, Cam Newton, Greg Olsen, and Ryan Kalil were the only players that the Panthers don't have to worry about. And after letting Steve Smith go, could there be team with a greater need at WR? I doubt it. But because the Panthers offense devalues WRs, more so this year as they fold in more two-TE sets, I think they go OT. Where Travis Bond and Nate Chandler represent the saddest duo of starting tackles in the NFL.
#29 - *** TRADE *** Houston Texans (from New England) : Zach Mettenberger [QB, LSU]
In the NFL, GMs average about a 3-4 year lifespan. If they don't have a starting caliber QB, they will need to prove that they are doing everything in their power to get one, or they'll be gone. GM Rick Smith has enjoyed 7 years as GM, but after last year's disastrous performance Smith will be on notice. Sure he can wait and see if Mettenberger falls to them, but if a team trades up to nab him, I'm not sure Smith is comfortable placing his job in the hands of Johnny Manziel. At least within Mettenberger, is a prototypical QB that HC Bill O'Brien is used to working with. If you disagree, picture O'Brien's old Patriot offense run by a QB that doesn't work within the constructs of the system. How would that go over?
Houston trades:
> 2nd Round (#33)
> 2015 4th Round Pick
New England trades:
> 1st Round (#29)
#30 - Dallas Cowboys (from San Francisco) : Kareem Martin [DE, North Carolina]
Last year, Grandpa Kiffin was brought in to transition the Cowboys to a 4-3 alignment. The change failed miserably as the Cowboys gave up the 3rd most yards per carry and was 25th in sacks. That said, I'm sure this schematic change was somehow aligned with phasing out DeMarcus Ware's deteriorated skills and inflated contract. But now that Ron Marinelli is the DC, a D-line guru, I imagine things will change up front. Kareem Martin has great size/speed/atheticism and was very productive in college. Why he hasn't gotten more pub is a mystery for me, but he could be a good strong-side DE.
#31 - Denver Broncos : Donte Moncrief [WR, Mississippi]
It's highway robbery that the Broncos roster is as good as it is. They have so few holes, that they could easily go with the BPA appraoch and not regret it the least bit. If they did have a need, it would be at OT, MLB, or CB. But with what's available, I think they go with the best player available. If I had to guess what their board would look like, I would think that Donte Moncrief would be just that guy. He offers the same silly freakish athetic ability that could grow into something special, like Demaryius Thomas. While having a guy like Moncrief on the roster, it would remove leverage that Thomas would have in this contract year.
#32 - Seattle Seahawks : Marcus Roberson [CB, Florida]
The Seahawks have a knack for plugging in CBs whenever one goes down, but this year they lost two good CBs. Brandon Browner and Walter Thurmond will be hard to replace, so this pick makes a lot of sense. Roberson was always the other CB in Florida, as Loucheiz Purifoy was more highly touted. But Roberson checks all the boxes that Seattle wants in their CBs. Good size, long arms, good tackles, and can play press man. If not CB, there is a need to replace Breno Giacomini and Paul McQuistan who shared RT duties.
Bold. Very bold indeed. I think there's zero chance the Vikings move up to #2. I think they're gun shy to take the first QB off the board - to put even more pressure on the front office with all the "could have had ____ instead of ____" talk. I can see them moving up to get one of the guys they want but don't think will be at 8, but I don't think they would go as high as #2. Plus, at #8, you've got the ability to move down and still get a guy to develop. I think they will take best player available at 8 unless a bunch of guys they want remain (trade down 4-5 spots) or trade up to #4-5 if there's a guy they really want but knows won't get to them.
ReplyDeleteI'm interested to hear more opinions on this, but I think that there is a decent chance this happens (for many reason). [1] The lifespan of an NFL GM is very limited. Patiently waiting for a developmental QB to mature is a luxury that very few organizations have. So picking a QB later in the draft is risky business. [2] If Bortles and Carr (who are Norv Turner scheme fits) are gone at #8, going with Bridgewater or Manziel are picks that can sizzle... but bring the biggest bust potential. [3] The defensive options at 8 are not logical. Aaron Donald is the best option... but it would cause Spielman to admit he made a mistake with Sharrif Floyd last year. Kahlil Mack or Dee Ford are poor fits as 43 DEs. CB Kyle Fuller would be a reach. MLB CJ Mosley's injury history makes him a risky proposition at such a high pick.
ReplyDeleteOn the note of trading down, you have to have the right trading partner and situation. Off the jump, the most likely teams with sufficent ammo to make moves this year are: Jacksonville, Cleveland, and San Francisco. Everyone else would need to morgage future draft picks, player contracts, or just flat out give away draft picks. None of these three teams are a few picks down.
Which team are you thinking that will proactively call the Vikings for their 8th pick? Who is that must have player that a team would trade up for, and to get in front of what team or teams? Not trying to be a jerk. I'm just trying to map out the logical path.
Retraction: CB Kyle Fuller would be a good pick.
DeleteAlso, there is a chance that Gilbert, Bortles or Carr could fall to 8. Each of these guys would be good picks, if Spielman finds a way to stay patient.
First of all, bravo Gow. In this post alone, you've dedicated over 4300 words to the draft. Combining that with all your previous posts, you've probably writeen 20-25K words to this. That's pretty awesome. It honestly makes me feel bad that I haven't spent more time lately commenting and having discussions on here. Because that's a whole lot of work/time that you put into this simply because you chose to. So well done.
ReplyDeleteNow with that said, allow me to crap all over this...
I would hate this result, if it happened. The Vikings should not be trading up, and certainly not all the way to #2. More than likely one or more of the big 3 QB's are going to fall to #8. And even if they don't, then they're getting a hell of a player at 8 or a damn good package to move back. This draft has more juniors than ever before (not even close) and I want more picks, not less.
If we do trade up, it had better be for Teddy or Johnny Football. If we take stupid Blake Bortles, I'm super skeptical. Where was all the Bortles love during the season? Nowhere. He's completely shot up the draft boards with combine and pro day performances, especially after a number of QB's didn't come out (Mariota, UCLA guy, another one I can't remember). Don't draft a QB just because he's big.
I've made no secret that I'm a Teddy guy and that's who I want at 8 or wherever the Vikes end up drafting. For me, if not TB, I'd go defense, specifically DL or CB/Safety. Don't take a LB at 8, unless it's Kahlil Mack. I don't know if Aaron Donald, Justin Gilbert, Kyle Fuller, HaHa Dix or whoever is worthy of #8, but that's probably who we're looking at if we don't take a QB.
No worries Rod. I know that the lack of responses has no bearing on appreciation, much like when you posts on here during the season.
DeleteNow a week into mulling the trade, I feel the cost to get to the 2nd pick will be too rich. As for a potential trade down from #8, I'm running through some scenarios... but nothing seems obvious (yet). The closest so far is maybe the Rams trading up from 13 to 8, jumping BUF, DET, and NYG for Mike Evans or Sammy Watkins (if either falls). It would take the 13th pick, 75th, and a 2015 4th RD pick.
And BTW, there's a whole lot of smoke coming from Spielman and the Vikings right now that is being sucked up by the media that MN won't take a QB at #8. If the past is any track record, I'm that much more confident that we are taking a QB. Spielman lies, lies, lies before every draft. Remember how, despite Matt Kalil being the most obvious pick ever, the media jumped on the "Morris Claiborne to MN" bandwagon and it turned into 3 extra pics? We're taking a QB early.
ReplyDeleteIf I'm proven wrong, we are assuredly taking one at #40, if not trading back up into the end of Round 1. I'm super confident in that.
I 100% agree. Spielman is a lying SOB, and sadly everyone knows it. If he were smart, he would not say anything at all. So I would also be shocked if they left the 1st round without a QB.
DeleteAlso, if they were to trade up from #40 (Round 2), here are some options. Based off the Trade Value Chart, their 2nd and first 3rd could net a 24th overall pick. Or the 2nd and second 3rd could net a 31st overall pick. But that said, I can easily picture a very aggressive market for teams looking to trade into the 22 to 32 range. If this is the case, the price could easily exceed the values I stated.
I was not impressed by Bortles in their bowl game. His arm didn't look near as strong to me as everybody seems to be saying it is. It is just one game but he didn't flash top QB in the draft to me. :2cents:
ReplyDelete